Talk:Appulse

Finding info
hello fellow wikipediaers, where can i find more info on appulses? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aper0793 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

well fellow wikipediars, ive been doing some research lately on appulses and every website and source that ive stumbled upon pretty much just gives me the same definition. woth an extra fact or tow some im going to add those facts to our wiki stub... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aper0793 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

well fellow wikipediars i contributed to our stub... heres the website where i found that information i tried to site it but failed epically http://members.bitstream.net/bunlion/bpi/EclGeom.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aper0793 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

i gave up trying to find sources online so i went to the library and looked for information in various encylopedias and i found nothing. it was quite frustrating knowing that i can't find anymore info on appulses.Aper0793 (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Article Merge
IMHO This should not be merged. A conjunction between planets is a specific type of appulse. -- unsigned comment by User:68.196.122.36


 * I agree. Both pages use the same illustration and provide the same definition.  Appulse should be a redirect.  MaxEnt (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

My opinion: Links between these pages are sufficiant, they should not be merged. 65.77.28.38 (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Marshall Smith OkC, OK 65.77.28.38 (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

The first citation `Her Majesty's Nautical Almanac Office and United States Naval Observatory (2012). "Appulse". Glossary, The Astronomical Almanac Online. Retrieved 2012-07-08.` is a dead link. Nebulösschwarzfahrer (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I've fixed the broken link, which was caused by changes in the website linked to. Many thanks to Nebulösschwarzfahrer for noticing this and pointing out the problem. TowardsTheLight (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC)