Talk:AquaBounty Technologies

CSD, AfD
AquaBounty technologies has been in the new continuously over the last few months because of the ongoing public debate and approval process regarding the AquaBounty transgenic Salmon product. I want to create a good NPOV stub, so that people who keep reffering to the company in public online debates have a place to refer to get vetted information. Infoeco (talk) 14:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi there! I changed it from a speedy delete to an Article listed for Deletion. You can go use the link on the main article page to see the consensus and also make comments. This will give you some time to flesh out this article. It might not pass, or it might. At this point I am not involved with its fate. Thanks!  Golgofrinchian  (talk)  14:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AquaBounty Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628022809/http://www.aquabounty.com/company/company-history-292.aspx to http://www.aquabounty.com/company/company-history-292.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121121155/http://fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/18699/Delays_put_question_mark_over_GM_salmon_as_development_company_receives_bid.html to http://www.fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/18699/Delays_put_question_mark_over_GM_salmon_as_development_company_receives_bid.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Structure of the Article
I would suggest to put the History subsection further on top of the page rather than at the bottom. Right now it is on the bottom, with two other entries (subchapters) on top; I think it would make more sense to arrange History closer to the top in general. For instance, I specifically came to the article because I wanted to read up on the history specifically, in regards to fish, so this is the most relevant part for me. The other parts are good to know as well, but history is where my interest was when coming to the article (this is tied to how much fish are produced globally in "aqua-farms", so not solely confined to the company as-such). 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 13:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Agreed. History is normally at the top, at the bottom is certainly unusual. Done: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AquaBounty_Technologies&diff=1036460802&oldid=1035844907 Invasive Spices (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)