Talk:Aqueduct (band)

Concern of subject of article
Seeing as how the link to Aqueduct's 2005 album clearly cites major music review sites shows that Aqueduct is of concern of enough people and notable by Wikipedia's standards. They also released a new album a week ago, so their popularity should fluctuate because of this. They are also signed to Barsuk records which is a notable music entity. Both of these are criterion clearly stated in the music notability section. Because of those 2 reasons I'm removing the tag at the top of the article. I encourage anybody with concerns to voice them on the talk page. --CountCrazy007 02:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Aqueduct (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060223062952/http://www.aqueductisgoodmusic.com:80/press.html to http://www.aqueductisgoodmusic.com/press.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227031522/http://www.pressplayrecord.com:80/2007/02/aqueduct.html to http://www.pressplayrecord.com/2007/02/aqueduct.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:16, 16 October 2016 (UTC)