Talk:Arab conquests

March 2023
could you please not edit-war over a redirect? This page has been stable since 2019, so per WP:BRD please take your disagreements to a talk page instead. The reasons for redirecting to Early Muslim conquests were already explained in my earlier edit summary and I've left additional comment about this at the RfD here. As for your question here, the singular form could probably also redirect to the same place or, better yet, could be deleted for being too vague. As I commented at the RfD, "Arab conquests" (plural) is a term that usually refers the topic of Early Muslim conquests, as should be easy to see when searching reliable sources (e.g. ). R Prazeres (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Per WP:PLURAL, both should have the same target. And I oppose having Early Muslim conquests as the same targget, because the expression has no primary topic. Veverve (talk) 18:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Then please start another RfD. The primary topic is quite obvious to me, and another user has also questioned your decision . WP:PLURAL, if applicable to this situation, also clearly lists exceptions: "Sometimes, however, a plural form will establish a separate primary topic." (WP:DIFFPLURAL) R Prazeres (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Early Muslim conquests which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)