Talk:Arachne (archaeological database)

Close paraphrasing
See: http://csanet.org/newsletter/spring07/nls0703.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwoodger (talk • contribs) 13:37, 6 September 2009‎ (UTC)

Close paraphrasing: the basic Wikipedia-article is indeed close to the source that is quoted here. But over time additions and updates do get into the Wikipedia-article while the quoted source remains as it is. Therefore the resemblance between both is declining. I did some updates over time, and will continue to do so. Furthermore I have to say that in the beginning I could hardly find the time or the words to say the same one thing in english in two ways: one time for the article and one time for the Wikipedia-article. I think that it is really a question of the viewpoint to mark this as close paraphrasing. In my view this would only be right if the Wikipedia-article would have never been changed by me. But this is up to you. Foertsch (talk) 21:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Given your response I think it is more of a conflict of interest issue. Independent sources need to be found for this material. RockMagnetist (talk) 06:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Arachne (archaeological database). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081018184255/http://www.arachne.uni-koeln.de:80/ to http://www.arachne.uni-koeln.de/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101210193941/http://www.propylaeum.de/classical-archaeology/thematic-portals/rezeptionderantike.html?L=1 to http://www.propylaeum.de/classical-archaeology/thematic-portals/rezeptionderantike.html?L=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)