Talk:Aram Satyan

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/aramsatian. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 10:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Notability
This composer is very notable and should have an article on Wikipedia. The article needs a lot of improvement, and its creator got off to a very rocky start, but it should not be proposed for deletion. It would help if someone who can read either Russian or Armenian could contribute to sourcing the article and adding his name in Armenian. Voceditenore (talk) 11:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Recent edits
Unfortunately, the article's creator, User:Showart, despite multiple warnings, has once again pasted in the copyright text from http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/aramsatian which I had removed. I have removed it once again and re-written some of it to include in the article. Please do not add it again. Not only is it a copyright violation, it is in poor English, badly punctuated and written in a promotional tone which is entirely unsuitable for an encyclopedia article. Voceditenore (talk) 06:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)