Talk:Aranmula Kannadi

Conflicting, unreferenced statements
I just happened on this article, and I notice that there are two conflicting statements - neither of which has a source. The two statements are: "These unique metal mirrors are the result of Kerala's rich cultural and metallurgical traditions" which would signify that this is a result of a craft which is a part of Kerala's culture/traditions, and then there's this statement: "eight families of experts in temple arts and crafts were brought by the royal chief to Aranmula from Tirunelveli district to work in the Parthasarathy temple centuries ago on the mirrors." These are conflicting in nature because - if artisans were brought from Tirunelveli to Kerala to work on these mirrors, then the mirrors are not necessarily a product entirely born of the culture and tradition of Kerala. Can someone who knows more about this subject help in clearing this up? By adding proper sources, of course.

If I do not see a response for this message within thirty days, I will be given to understand that nobody is 'watching' this page, and hence, I can remove the two unsourced claims/statements. a JC freak  y A k  13:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Aranmula kannadi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130826183844/http://ipindia.nic.in/girindia/ to http://ipindia.nic.in/girindia/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:07, 11 November 2016 (UTC)