Talk:Arauco War

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Stevetheepic. Peer reviewers: ParkerBarkr, TyTrev2024, Skillebrew25.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Catalian de erauso
When did Catalina de Erauso participate? --84.20.17.84 16:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * If you read the article of Catalina de Erauso it is written "She served in Chile in the wars with the Araucano Indians.", the spanish version also says that and in | this site it is also said. Dentren  |  Ta lk  00:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes she earned her military title Alferez in the Army of the Kingdom of Chile. Lots of detail in her bio.Asiaticus (talk) 21:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

New article needed for Chilean relations/wars with Aruaco
I think that the relations between Chile and Arauco should have their own article dating from the independance of Chile and only leave a short postscipt in this article refering to the highlights of the new article so formed. Asiaticus (talk) 21:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Spelling
The article spells "Mapuches" several different ways in the same article. Perhaps there is no one official spelling, but you would think we would be consistent in the same article. The same goes for other proper nouns like Quillin and Lautaro. Art LaPella (talk) 04:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

KIngdom of Chile
On the belligerents table, when the sides participating are written it says "kingdom of Chile" Kingdom of Chile? Where does that name come from? It was a capitania general, a way for the spanish to name some of its colonies, not an independant kingdom. It only served (officialy) the king of Spain. Can someone edit that to correction please?

KIngdom of Chile
On the belligerents table, when the sides participating are written it says "kingdom of Chile" Kingdom of Chile? Where does that name come from? It was a capitania general, a way for the spanish to name some of its colonies, not an independant kingdom. It only served (officialy) the king of Spain. Can someone edit that to correction please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.136.98.47 (talk) 23:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Result
Hello 190.43.38.134. The battle of La Albarrada was not decisive, there are no sources that indicate such a thing. The Parliament of Quillín, while setting a precedent, was not decisive. The subject of vassalage must be analyzed carefully, since this point was very variable in time. Furthermore, the Mapuche did not capitulate in this parliament as indicated in that document that you cite. Spanish officials used this formula in the document to minimize their position in the agreement, since it was the Spanish who asked to negotiate. Read page 73 of the source you provided. Muwatallis II (talk) 04:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Indigenous Latin America
— Assignment last updated by Sheldon Rooster (talk) 20:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)