Talk:Arava Power Company

Merge
I think this article should be merged into the economy section of the kibbutz Ketura article. Any objections? -- Nudve (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Disagree. This company is worth to have its own article. Beagel (talk) 08:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Arava Power Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713011625/http://www.jhasol.org:80/JHAaboutus/about_jewish_heart_for_africa/about_us.html to http://www.jhasol.org/JHAaboutus/about_jewish_heart_for_africa/about_us.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815200611/http://www.bustan.org:80/default2.asp to http://www.bustan.org/default2.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Paid editing Dove3579
The user identified themselves as Arava Power Company in an image they uploaded, thus the user disclosed they were editing for the company. . Graywalls (talk) 09:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * That is not evidence of anything. The photo was uploaded in 2012. It is now 2021..--Geewhiz (talk) 09:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC).
 * The user identified themselves as uploading from Arava Power Company. The passage of time doesn't make it expire. Graywalls (talk) 09:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Also see the authorship and uploader name in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ketura3.jpg I believe that's enough to pass WP:DUCK test that they were editing here on behalf of the company. Graywalls (talk) 10:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Your edit summary when you re-added paid contributions wanted the "rule" where it says discussion is required. Please see the documentation at paid contributions. Specifically, this: Like the other neutrality-related tags, if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article . If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning. I see you've started this discussion here after I reverted you, but you still have not identified what is non-neutral about the article. What did you identify in the article that was non-neutral so other editors can try and resolve the issue? —Locke Cole • t • c 14:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree, I am not seeing anything that is specifically non-neutral, and I am not aware that WikiCommons has a law specifying that a company logo cannot be uploaded by a member of the company.--Geewhiz (talk) 14:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Parts, such as Social Mission and solar creativity, are not consistent with what's encyclopedic. There's an overall copywriting tone to the article. I have just trimmed out some of the obvious ones. Please see the changes. Graywalls (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)