Talk:Archaeology of Igbo-Ukwu/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 15:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I did a brief copy-edit for some simple errors, this shouldn't bias my review. The prose could be more polished, but is acceptable. No copyvios.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References are formatted properly and consistently. All content is verifiable and adequately cited. Offline sources accepted AGF.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Focused, yet provides key context and information.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The praise directed toward the Igbo-Ukwu culture in the article mirrors that found in the sources cited. It presents alternative views in a fair, unbiased manner.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Very stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are public domain in the US, and, as this is an article on the archaeology of a culture, are vital to the topic at hand.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 16:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: The prose could use some polishing, but it is acceptable. Overall, a good article. The subject is very important, and I would highly recommend bringing this article up to featured status. It certainly deserves more attention.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 17:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: