Talk:Archimago

Anyone else working on this? Emries (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I took a stab at this - it needs major clean up. It looks like someone cut and paste an academic article on Archimago into this page (I think Harry Berger's peice from SEL?) I'm certain this is not acceptable for Wikipedia. Berger's views are great, obviously, but article needs to show a range of scholarly views, not just one critic's argument. Right now, it doesn't read as objective or encyclopedic. --Trixi72 (talk) 00:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)