Talk:Architect of the Capitol

"Controversy" -- not sufficiently notable
I question the notability of this. The decision was later reversed, and the kid got his certificate. This is certainly not one of the top 50 controversies involving the AOC in the history of the office. I will delete it if there is not serious objection. Thesmothete 05:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah... although you've already removed. It was just a minor blip on the radar. It was somewhat notable (in that it received some news coverage), but probably not enough. We don't need to document every little tiny "controversy" in every article. Mahalo. --Ali&#39;i 21:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Architect of the Capitol. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.aoc.gov/aoc/press-room/Stephen-Ayers-confirmed-by-Senate.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Agency or person?
...or one-man agency, if that's a thing? DAVilla (talk) 00:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The term refers to both the agency (which has over 2000 staff) and its head. Nurg (talk) 01:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)