Talk:Architecture of Leeds/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello! I'll be reviewing Architecture of Leeds (the article, not the actual architecture), in line with the Good Article criteria. I see there has been a previous review, and I shall be using the comments made there in this review. Good luck! - we eb il oo bi l  ( talk ) 16:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC) A comparison of the changes made since the last review

Oh dear

Plus points

 * All but one of the pictures are properly licensced
 * Passes WP:LAYOUT
 * Passes WP:JARGON
 * The article is broad, yet focused
 * The article is stable

Urgent!

 * The fair use rationale for File:Quarry Hill Flats1.jpg appears to be malformed.

Bad bits
This is not a definitive list
 * Spelling and grammar: "While the first church in Leeds is thought to have been built around 600 AD.[2]"
 * Fails WP:LEAD: see WP:BOLDTITLE for why
 * Fails WP:AVOID: "It is generally regarded as one of the best examples of Norman churches in Yorkshire.[4]" by who? generally? one of the best? too unspecific
 * Fails WP:VERIFY: "Headingley[7] and Wetherby[8][9] both had castles dating from this era, however there are no notable visible remains of either of the structures. Headingley Castle was redeveloped into a Tudar-Gothic Villa of the same name.[7]" - source 7 is a photo of a hotel, with the castle glimpsed in the b/g. Where is the source for this info?
 * Fails WP:NPOV: the best example being "Leeds now has some of the best high rise architecture outside of London, in particular Bridgewater Place. "

The above includes only one example for each of the failed criterion; if you need any explanation, or more examples, feel free to contact me.

Unfortunately, I feel that I have to fail the article, based on the information provided above. Feel free to relist the article at WP:GAN when you feel it is ready. Thanks - we eb il oo bi l  ( talk ) 16:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Editors Notes

Point 1: Looked over, needs more attention

Point 2: Sorted

Point 3: To look over

Point 4: To look over

Point 5: Sored

Licence Malformation
The licence for Quarry Hill is replicated three times to provide it with sufficient justification for fair use on each page. If anyone knows a better way, please tell me. Mtaylor848 (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)