Talk:Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader? (Australian game show)

Number of multiples of 3 under 20
I added a paragraph to this article basically saying that there are an infinite number of multiples of 3 below 20, rather than the "correct" answer given in the show of "six". It was removed in just a few minutes. I'm wondering if it was removed because there was an issue with the factual nature of the paragraph (ie. I'm wrong) or if it was removed because it could be percieved to have cast the show in a poor light or if there was some other reason? Gasdive 21:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * While there are technically an infinite number of multiples of 3 below 20 (indeed, that's what I remarked when I saw it), the term multiples is generally used to describe positive integer multiples, I think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.59.237 (talk) 00:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Remember, this show is based on Yr 5 curriculum. I think the question referred to "multiples of 3 between zero and twenty" as in no negative numbers or fractions etc, just the ones found on an ordinary times tables chart. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.238.240.208 (talk) 04:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The question was probably referring to natural multiples only (1,2....)Baggers89 (talk) 13:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Your paragraph was probably removed because it was perceived as irrelevant (i.e. including material more advanced than the 5th grade curriculum), but it may also have been perceived as wrong. In both cases, the reason it that the term "multiple" is generally used to described positive multiples, which is the meaning taught in school (it's the meaning taught at that level of school, at least). It may have been removed because it cast the show in a poor light, but Wikipedia does not tolerate any edits being made for that reason. Brian Jason Drake 04:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Contestant selection
Are the contestants on this show regular folk or casted by casting agenices? They seem to be overacting (badly) to me, I would be glad to be proven wrong however. 58.163.131.92 09:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, they do seem to be overacting a bit. It seems unlikely that contestants would be chosen based on acting ability alone (or even primarily for their acting ability), however. For the second series at least, they ask a lot of questions that have nothing to do with acting, and they don't say that they want actors. I don't know anything about contestant selection though. Brian Jason Drake 04:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Contradiction?
Article says that one man has won $500,000 and then says that no adults have won the $500,000 prize.

98.117.124.23 (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)