Talk:Arefeh Mansouri

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arefeh Mansouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423140440/http://news.style.com/fashion/news/arefeh_mansouri/ to http://news.style.com/fashion/news/arefeh_mansouri/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Harvard
The main contributor to this article asserts Mansouri attained a degree from Harvard and has added two links as refs to that effect. However, neither link mentions Mansouri at all. Adding details like attending one of the most prestigious universities without citation is an example of puffery and aggrandizing the subject of the article, which is a concern for Biographies of Living Persons (BLPs). JesseRafe (talk) 20:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * This link is for Harvard Kennedy school alumni please see class note 2016 you will find Arefeh Mansouri. You can not submit a class note if you are not an alumni That is why this source is reliable

https://www.hks.harvard.edu/more/alumni/get-connected/classnotes/summer-2017 Fashionnews2012 (talk) 21:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * here is another source

https://idesignawards.com/winners/zoom2.php?eid=9-7307-14 Fashionnews2012 (talk) 21:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Film Director
The main contributor to the article has insisted on including, as a whole section, a non-notable film. The film description is poorly written and consists almost entirely of weasel words, "A Luxurious vision of Love wrapped in Mystery," and then doubles-down on some egregious descriptions of the accolades the film supposedly won -- from non-notable entities, wikilinking the word award for good measure. This is textbook undue weight, the subject is not known as a film director and the film is not notable. If a good source can be found, this could be a sentence in her career section. The Costume Designer's Guild magazine is an industry magazine and has few details about the film or the awards and is probably not a reliable source. The other ref is a Facebook post which just links to a YouTube video. The description from the YT video is the exact same verbiage used here on Wikipedia and was uploaded by YT user "Arefeh Fashion", so either it is a copyright violation or the YT user Arefeh Fashion and WP user Fashionnews2012 are the same person, marking this as a case of COI/NPOV. JesseRafe (talk) 20:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Maybe other contributors can edit this part and add it to her career

Fashionnews2012 (talk) 21:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

tags

 * I created the page and it was edited and cleaned up by other wikipedia contributors please remove the tagsFashionnews2012 (talk) 18:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Literally untrue. I put the tags on the page yesterday after I gave the article a massive cleanup, no other editors have touched it since. The concerns with the tags are still the case, and as you are clearly a Single-purpose account you should absolutely not be the one to take down a notice about concerns with your editing. JesseRafe (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * It is a misunderstanding

Jesse Thank you for editing this article. Since you gave the article a massive clean up please remove the tags. Fashionnews2012 (talk) 20:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Why would I take down tags I put up because I think the article is still problematic? JesseRafe (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * This page is edited. Remove the tagsFashionnews2012 (talk) 17:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Issues remain. JesseRafe (talk) 18:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * It is edited and cleaned up If other editors have more information they can add to this article/ source

Remove tagsFashionnews2012 (talk) 18:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * And the tags will remain until they do so. JesseRafe (talk) 18:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * editedFashionnews2012 (talk) 19:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Remove tagsFashionnews2012 (talk) 20:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * This is just getting silly. Please stop repeating yourself on here. As I said, there are issues with this article, including your apparent close involvement. The tags will remain until the issues are fully resolved. Specifically if another editor comes who is not affiliated with this article or its history and checks the tags and decides the issue(s) is/are handled sufficiently that the tags can be removed. Until then, writing a couple of times a day "remove tags" will get you nowhere. JesseRafe (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes it is getting silly. After the article is edited is normal to ask to remove tags. I told you I am not affiliated with this person every part of this article comes from different sources so remove COI.  peacock (you need to be specific). Fashionnews2012 (talk) 21:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)