Talk:Ares IV (Star Trek)

Requested moves

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Closing after 6 days, 11-0 in favour of move. --GW_SimulationsUser Page 23:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ares IV → Ares IV (Star Trek)
 * Ares IV (launch vehicle) → Ares IV
 * Ares IV (launch vehicle) is about a real proposal for a rocket, which has a good chance of being built. This article is about a ficticious spaceship from the Star Trek universe. I would say that the rocket proposal is more notable, and therefore it should have the name Ares IV, and this page should be moved elsewhere, with a disambiguation link on the new Ares IV page linking to it. --GW_SimulationsUser Page 12:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey

 * Add  # Support   or   # Oppose   on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~ .

Survey - Support votes

 * 1) Nominate and Support --GW_SimulationsUser Page 12:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom. PC78 14:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Grant 16:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Support per nom. GassyGuy 20:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Support per nom.Bchan 21:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Support because reality is more important than fiction. Rdl381 00:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Support I don't even think the Star Trek ship is notable enough to warrant the page by itself. It should be merged into a greater article about Trek ships. 205.157.110.11 01:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Support 75.14.58.185 01:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Support -- Reality should always trump fiction. --Altanar 01:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Support, WP:SNOW? --Wirbelwind ヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 00:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Support and delete the Star Trek page or merge it into something else. &mdash;Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 06:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Add any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.