Talk:Argo (2012 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 20:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * Lead
 * How the CIA Used a Fake Sci-Fi Flick to Rescue Americans from Tehran
 * Articles should be in quotes, not italics (see the production section for an example). Viriditas (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 03:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The list of awards is incredibly distracting (WP:SEAOFBLUE) and makes reading comprehension difficult. Minimize links within prose whenever possible.  If you aren't sure how to fix this, look at an award-winning FA film article.  Going from memory, the best way to do this is to summarize the awards (MOS:INTRO) and link to maybe one or two, possibly three.  Currently, you've got fifteen links in the third paragraph lead summary of the awards, and that's excessive because extensive studies have shown that multiple links disrupt the reader. Viriditas (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)


 * References
 * Template error fixed. Viriditas (talk) 21:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Does article need any assistance, please let me know. I will be addressing all the issues. Thanks for the review. -- Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 06:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the delay. I've been quite ill, but hopefully improving.  I might get to the review by Monday or Tuesday.  Thanks for your patience. Viriditas (talk) 23:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)