Talk:Argyrocytisus

Requested move 15 January 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Argyrocytisus → Argyrocytisus battandieri – There is only one species in this genus. The article is a description of the species rather than the genus; therefore the correct heading should be the name of the species (with a redirect from the name of the genus). Darorcilmir (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * This suggestion looks like being controversial. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Per WP:MONOTYPICFLORA, the genus name should be used as the title for an article covering a monotypic genus and its sole species. However, there is an active discussion about modifying this convention., perhaps you'd like to contribute your thoughts at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life? Plantdrew (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Existing guidance is to use the genus name. That is under discussion. If that changes, then a requested move would be in order. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨   23:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Pending clarification of guideline. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life William Avery (talk) 23:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Per MONOTYPIC and the ongoing discussion that shows no consensus so far.-- Kev min  § 00:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.