Talk:Aria (manga)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 21:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Alright. This has been renominated after it previously did not pass the criteria. I will look at it once again and see if it now passes the criteria. Link20XX (talk) 21:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

I have completed my initial review, and I must say the improvements made are clear. You definitely followed my advice, just a few small things before I can promote this (you can make the changes here, I won't fail it).

Checklist
Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments
Characters:
 * Source 20 is still a 404 error, but since source 21 has the information, is it even needed?
 * Changed source 20 to an archive link and removed one redundant usage of it. It works for me, but I assume it's blocked due to a geo-block.
 * Anime News Network's encyclopedia and Voice Actor Database are not reliable sources since anyone can edit them, so you need a different source
 * The JP voice actor database is considered reliable, but I have changed the ANN encyclopedia links. See here.
 * The part about Siren Visual's license should be in the same paragraph as Nozomi's, since Australia is also an English speaking majority territory.
 * It's already in the same paragraph.
 * Reference 173 needs a better archive url
 * Fixed.
 * The url for the Mag Garden sources appear to be a not found error. Maybe get archive urls for them?
 * Fixed.
 * Monthly Undine is as of March 2008? Maybe you should update it?
 * Updated.
 * I'm also getting a 404 error for reference 214.
 * Converted to archive link. Assuming this is a geo-block again.
 * 223 also needs an archive url
 * Fixed.

That is all. Once each is addressed, I will promote it. Link20XX (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks Link. I've fixed all of them. 0qd (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Just a couple more things (this is it I promise): One, in Reception, 4 citations are used in a row, which violates WP:CITEOVERKILL, and 2, there is an unassigned url in the The President Cat Picture books subsection of Media. Fix those and I will pass it. Side note but jeez this is the second time I have run into geo-blocking today on Wikipedia. Link20XX (talk) 23:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've fixed those. Thanks for pointing out the unassigned URL — archiving the Mag Garden articles was a pain, haha. 0qd (talk) 23:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Oops, sorry about that. Now I've fixed it. Made an error in the last edit. 0qd (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * There is still one reference clump left ([224][230][231][232]). You can use WP:CITEBUNDLE if you want. Link20XX (talk) 23:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for being patient, very tired. I've fixed it by removing the weakest citation. 0qd (talk) 23:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Alright. All of my issues have been fixed, so as promised, the article is now a GA. Congratulations! You worked very hard for this, and certainly deserve it. The result of this review is Pass. Link20XX (talk) 23:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks again. Really appreciate you responding quickly and being patient with my errors there at the end. 0qd (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Don't mention it, that's my job as a reviewer. You deserve all the real credit. If you would like, you can even enter for it to be featured in WP:DYK so a fact from it will appear on the main page. Link20XX (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)