Talk:Ariane 5/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Balon Greyjoy (talk · contribs) 18:00, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

I will be conducting the review of this article. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I've had some things come up IRL, and won't be able to complete this review until next week. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 20:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * No concern, the earwig search yielded a 13.8% chance of copyright infringement, and all of the similarities were either unavoidable ("Ariane 5 development") or direct quotes.
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Update
Hello, This review has not been worked on in two months. The nominator has not edited the article in two months and the reviewer has not taken any steps to get the nominator involved. This stale review is holding up the backlog of GAN reviews and making others wait longer. I am sorry to say that this review will be failed as a result of inactivity. Please renominate when ready to accept the task of reviewing/fixing issues. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * My apologies, life got away from me this past summer. I am happy to review this article, if UnknownM1 would re-nominate it. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 14:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)