Talk:Ariel Meredith/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Starting Review. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Hails from is not very good prose, sounds like advertising blurb. Background section needs some more expansion. Father's name for instance? Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Changed to "A native of. . ."--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * [dabfinder.py] reports 5 wiki links to disambiguation pages. All cited references are live, no evidence of WP:OR. Sources appear to be WP:RS Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article is quite minimalist. Is this all there is? Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Pretty much. She is at the start of her career.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Appears to conform to WP:NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * Appears to be stable, no evidence of edit warring. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image used is correctly licensed and tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

This article may be passed if above concerns are met. I am putting it on hold Jezhotwells (talk) 13:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC) OK, all seems in order. PASS Jezhotwells (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)