Talk:Arizona State Route 89A/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Arizona State Route 89A/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This isn't a review, per se, but I have a couple comments. First, the lead needs to be expanded to around two or three times its current length. Also, the image layout is odd. Maybe remove a couple of them and stick 'em in a Commons cat? Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * P.S. I'd expand the lead a bit to make better mention of Sedona and Oak Creek Canyon, maybe at least a sentence a piece? Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It's been well over the 7 days with no activity so I'm failling this article. Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)