Talk:Ark (search engine)

Article seems to favor or advertise, neutrality disputed.
Article shows favoritism towards Ark search engine. Apparent in the language used to describe the engine, as in the following examples:

"Users can easily manage. . ."

". . . an easy to navigate, stylish platform."

". . . great way to get into contact"

". . . makes managing your email inbox extremely easy"

In addition to biased language, the article seems to contain phrases that commonly signal persuasion or poor writing.

"At first glance Ark looks similar. . ."

"The best part about Ark is the privacy . . ."'

I would guess that this was originally written by the company and cut and pasted to the page. Personal attempts to find material from this article on the Ark website or in a independent review have been unfruitful. Some parts are poorly written and one source is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honesttotodd (talk • contribs) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ark (search engine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513112418/http://www.dailycal.org/2012/05/09/startup-out-of-uc-berkeley-aims-to-revolutionize-people-search/ to http://www.dailycal.org/2012/05/09/startup-out-of-uc-berkeley-aims-to-revolutionize-people-search/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)