Talk:Armagnac

Discussion header
Three regions in Europe? Are we not counting Calvados?

Any suggestion on how to pronounce this?
 * We are indeed not counting calvados, which is produced from cider, not from wine.
 * The pronounciation of "Calvados" is quite straigtforward. "Armagnac" is pronounced "Armaniac", with a short "i". [aRmaɲak], in International Phonetic Alphabet. Rama 19:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

The fact that Calvados is produced from cider in no way alters its status as a brandy and an officialy demarcated brandy producing region.

Cognac is produced in alembic stills, while most Armagnac is made in column or continuous stills.

Armagnac is often aged in Monlezun black oak, Cognac is usually aged in Limousin or Troncais oak.

This article contains several unnecessary value judgments as to the quality of various brandies.

Actually Brandy needs to be made from grapes. Calvados is a fruit spirit.

But Spain has more then one region for Brandy; Jerez and Penedes.

To state that Armagnac is made by a column or continues still is misleading as this leads you to think that you use the same still as for vodka. In fact the still used for Armagnac is called alembic armagnacais and has a column with very few plates, maybe only three paltes. Similar stills are often used for rhum agricole.

For oak limousin and alsace is used more frequently then Monlezun

There is also a need for a paragraph on labeling regarding how age is labeled.

Source for example "Distilling Knowledege" Dave Broom 2006, Wine & Spirit Education Trust, London Puntos (talk) 08:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Puzzling statement
The article says "Ageing in the barrel removes a part of the alcohol by evaporation .... When the alcohol part reaches 40% or more, the armagnac is kept in large glass bottles" This seems to imply that aging continues until this is reached, and - but wait - it is going to start at 40% or more! What really happens? Notinasnaid 13:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Bouquetieres
I miss a statement to the bouquetieres or bonificateurs used in the Armagnac production !?! --Symposiarch 10:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Confusion
"Along with cognac in Cognac, France and sherry in Jerez, Spain, it is one of only three officially demarcated brandy regions in Europe." Perhaps I'm missing something, but how is sherry a demarcated brandy region, if sherry is a fortified wine, which I have never known to be a subset of brandy... -Verdatum (talk) 12:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Well you do get brandy from Jerez, but that's not quite what the sentence seems to be referring to. I have no idea whether the claim as a whole is true, and this WP page suggests that there are in fact more anyway. I've just taken it out as it seems dubious all round. --Nickhh (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Ageing requirements
The article states

"In the case of assemblies, the age on the bottle refers to the youngest component. An "XXX" or "VS" armagnac is a mix of several armagnacs of at least two years of ageing in wood. For the VSOP, the ageing is at least five years, and for XO, at least six. Richer and more interesting flavours appear from 15 or 20 years of ageing, or more."

It then goes on to state

"Ageing Requirements for armagnac are:   * VS [Very Special] " XXX "- at least one year old    * VSOP [Very Superior Old Pale] or Réserve - at least four years old    * XO, Napoléon, Extra, Vieille Réserve - at least five years old."

I do not see how these two claims are consistent - and I am not competent to decide which, if either, is correct. Any experts? --Silver149 (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmm, they're not consistent of course and anyway the second set look more like the (very similar) naming conventions used for Cognac. I've deleted the second part so only the first description is still there. They seem to be the correct designations and ageing stats, but it might be worth double-checking. --Nickhh (talk) 10:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Producers/Distributors/Retailers
Would anyone be able to start of list of companies that make/sell Armagnac? There is a similar list in Cognac and I think it'd be useful for people wanting to do *ahem* "further research" in Armagnac. --I (talk) 17:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't these tend to be either very subjective & NPOV if selective (ie the "best" producers), and liable to take up too much space on the page if completist? Plus they can easily end up being magnets for commercial spam. --Nickhh (talk) 10:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Those are both good points and I see their validity but if you have a look at how well it's worked in the Cognac article I think it'll work well in this article too (perhaps use the same format?). In order to address your first point I think there should be no distinction or selectivity - the listing should be either alphabetical or in order of founding, something which is fixed. As to the problem of having too big a list the Armagnac region is limited in size geographically and we could limit the list to those producers that a) have a website, b) have been reviewed in a third party source or c) both of the above/some other *simple* criteria. --I (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, I've had a look at the Cognac page, but I'm still not convinced tbh. It just seems a bit too commercial and/or listy to my eyes - and don't forget there are 1000s of small producers in Armagnac, so it would be have to be selective in some way, and I'm not sure what criteria it would be best or fairest to use. But I guess if you or anyone else wants to give it a go, it wouldn't be illegal as such of course. --Nickhh (talk) 17:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I can't help but feel that a year or so later, all we've got is a long and rather pointless list of non-notable and random producers. Is this actually telling anyone anything as currently set up? I'm quite tempted to just remove all these names ...--Nickhh (talk) 09:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * How about the five/ten largest sellers? That is determinable, and equitable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.251.177 (talk) 01:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Armagnac (brandy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228161543/http://www.wine-spirit.com:80/articles/55000/Blanche-d'Armagnac-draws-mixed-reactions.aspx?categoryid=276 to http://www.wine-spirit.com/articles/55000/Blanche-d'Armagnac-draws-mixed-reactions.aspx?categoryid=276
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518031948/http://www.france.fr:80/en/wines-spirits/cognac-and-armagnac to http://www.france.fr/en/wines-spirits/cognac-and-armagnac

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 26 January 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: consensus to move this page to Armagnac and the disambiguation page to Armagnac (disambiguation) at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 03:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Armagnac (brandy) → Armagnac (drink) – Reverse the redirect. Per WP:NCDAB, in this class and context, "(drink)" is the disambiguating phrase commonly used on other topics. This was to match, but that is now a redirect to Cognac. 94.21.204.175 (talk) 02:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC) --Relisted. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Armagnac →


 * Actually, [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Armagnac|Armagnac_(brandy)|Armagnac_(party)|Armagnac_(province) page view statistics] suggest that the drink is the primary topic for "Armagnac", with about 90% of the page views, so it may be better to move it to the base page name and move Armagnac over . 94.21.204.175 (talk) 02:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * My finds six other articles with this disambiguator. 94.21.204.175 (talk) 14:58, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Support Armagnac (brandy) →  per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. As for cognac, the brandy is much better known and far more likely to be sought than is the place. Move the dab page to Armagnac (disambiguation) —В²C ☎ 06:44, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Support. I had considered that this preponderance might be due to our Anglo-bias, but a check of the French Wikipedia shows the same thing; the drink is considerably more notable than the province. --  No COBOL  (talk) 07:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Support as per B²C and our IP address colleague above. This mirrors the solution used on Cognac.-Ich (talk) 10:37, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.