Talk:Armata Universal Combat Platform

Untitled
This page is in need of some updates... 78.69.39.156 (talk) 00:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Armata
Armata is likely to be direct borrowing from Polish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.187.112.177 (talk) 08:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Polish is likely to be direct borrowing from Russian.93.129.18.74 (talk) 10:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

2S35 Koalitsiya-SV

 * 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV: Self-propelled gun However, the 2S35's on display during the 2015 Moscow Victory Day Parade and its rehearsals are not actually built on the Armata platform but rather what appears to be a T-90 derived chassis. The system is practically 100% robot . 152 mm 2A86  . Firing range up to 70 km (2S35).  . Optionally with two guns can be made . Claimed firing rate peak more than 20 rounds per minute for a single cannon Firing rate for 2 cannons up to 16 rounds per minute is assumed.  The weight of 48 tons, 70 rounds ammunition, firing range 40 km (typical round) "CB-CS" option based on the wheeled truck.

This is new system almost completely robotic. . Main armament 1 or 2 2A86 cannon caliber 152 mm. . Maximum firing range:  40 km (base bleed) and up to 70 km. Rate of fire 16 (possible maximum of more than 20 rounds per minute for one gun). Weight 48 tonnes. Unit of fire: 70 rounds. The crew is protected by an internal armored capsule.

T-14 3 700 000 $

rg.ru officiale   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.218.182.81 (talk) 15:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Western media believe...
Regarding this edit, i btd. _Of course_ it was designed to surpass and overpower NATO technology. What else? One could ask (as i have) if the pope is catholic (i know the second part of this phrase). Stating the obvious - i'm not sure if this article needs statements like this. --

Russian Bias
This article reads like something out of RT in my opinion Bean guy2 (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)