Talk:Armchair cricket

unencyclopedic Content
This very good article has passages which to me dont sound like they should be in wikipedia (sounds more like a fansite explination), though as im not up with ettiquette ill stand back for a more expierienced user but ive listed those that struck me as unencyclopedic...

Im thinking things like the use of exclaimation marks "which are best introduced gradually" sounds more like personal opinion rather than encyclopedic fact... "Armchair Cricket played simply with the no-ball rule is a challenging game and reasonable simulation of cricket already." dosent sound encyclopedic.. "which players may like to think about how to incorporate into their house rules" perhaps something like "which can be simulated by house rules" "Perhaps you could adapt the lower-order batsmen rule to make it harder in the latter stages of a game?"

Mike 121.45.58.162 11:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
I am hoping for comments from fans of the game to improve the article. Remember you can edit it yourself, straightaway. Be bold! --Sumitrahman 10:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)