Talk:Armenia–Serbia relations/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 11:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this one over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 11:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Checklist

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Some initial comments:
 * Stability and images look good.
 * On references, some of your short cites don't actually link to long cites.


 * Lede
 * Looks good, but the first sentence is a little awkward. I'll try to figure out a better option.


 * History
 * "After the Ottomans conquered Belgrade, they destroyed the city's Armenian and Jewish cemeteries." This could use a citation.

I see you haven't edited in a while. Are you still active? If not, we should close this nomination and reopen when you return to active editing. --Coemgenus (talk) 11:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC) After 7 days without response from the nominator (or any eidts by him whatsoever,) I'll have to fail this. It's not bad though, and I'd encourage renomination later on. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)