Talk:Armenian National Congress (1917)

Only Armenian views
This article, like several others on Armenian topics that I have observed, is told from a very unilateral POV, only the Armenian one. No info on Russian or neighbouring Caucasian nations' (basicly Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey but also Iran) is included. This attitude is harming WP. I added a POV tag. --E4024 (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * What info do you expect to see in this article about Russia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Iran? -- Ե րևանցի talk  23:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Something unusual in Armenian-related articles: The position of others, in an NPOV manner. --E4024 (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Again, what kind of info do you expect to see here? -- Ե րևանցի talk  23:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this organization was very influential and worth article on WP, then it is very surprising that ONLY Armenian sources wrote about it. If third-party reliable and verifiable sources are not provided in near future, this article has to be suggested for speedy deletion. Best, 195.212.29.190 (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * And which POV-pushing troll are you a sock of, Mr IP? Let me guess...--Folantin (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Aw, come on, it's, isn't it? Who else tag-bombs Armenian articles with "POV" and "RefImprove" and signs his talk page comments "Best"? Who else loves to "speedy delete" articles he doesn't like?  --Folantin (talk) 14:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

End date
Do you know when this council ended (or dissolved, reorganized, etc.)? Best, 188.142.246.17 (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Refimprove
I put refimprove template due to the following non-verifiable and incomplete sources:
 * 1, a b Ter-Minassian p.30;
 * 3, a b Adalian p.76;
 * Ter-Minassian p.30 for Old Style date;
 * Hovannisian Republic, pp.16-17;
 * Ter-Minassian pp.30-31;
 * Hovannisian Republic, pp.17-18;
 * Ter-Minassian pp.33-34;
 * Ter-Minassian p.34

Best, Konullu (talk) 19:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * What the hell are you on about? Look in the bloody "Sources" section. Everybody knows this is really just about your blatant POV-pushing. --Folantin (talk) 21:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Folantin,
 * 1. POV and Refimprove templates are different. My aim is to improve references, I am not deleting, opposing, arguing, questioning anything.
 * 2. Sources section lists them, but the links are not provided and if we can provide verifiable sources (e.g. links to those researches, readable versions, etc.), let's provide them as well. Best, Konullu (talk) 23:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * You're not trying to delete articles? Then what is this? Proudbolsahye (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)