Talk:Armillaria luteobubalina

Update
Friday turned pear-shaped and I couldn't get to the library to check the one last tiny ref. I was intending to add about A. mellea being considered a cosmopolitan species until revision (as a beginning statement to clarify why we discuss splitting all the species in Europe and Nth America), and suspect Watling 1982 is the best source for that, but I don't have access to the full article. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I do—what's the full citation? Ucucha 07:30, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Watling, R., G.A. Kile and N.M. Gregory. 1982. The genus Armillaria - Nomenclature, Typification, the identity of Armillaria mellea and species differentiation. Trans. British Mycol. Soc. 78:271-285. - I'd love a copy :)) Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, can't access it either. Ucucha 11:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have that at my library, but am not sure when I can get there. Will add to the growing "to get" list. Sasata (talk) 15:53, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The one I go to says it has it but does not list years, so will check next week (Tuesday possibly). Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

<- I tweaked the wording a bit. Assuming that paper is going to say with we think it says, I think we can append a statement like "; this realization was paralleled with Australasian "A. mellea". " onto the end of the first paragraph to tie everything together. I'll look around in the meantime and see if there's another source to corroborate that. Sasata (talk) 22:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

I do feel it would benefit from a one line at the beginning of taxo discussion on mellea as being thought of as a single cosmopolitan species, which it sort-of does now -we just need a ref which states that (which I think Watling will)..Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah ok, I do have a good source for that. Now reffed, feel free to reshuffle. Sasata (talk) 00:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Fantastic - I just started browsing, could see hints but lacked the right page.... :( Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I have the Watling article - 16 pages on the confusion around the genus and the species...dry. Casliber (talk · contribs) 15:52, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Reorganizing bibliography alphabetically
Alphabetically is much better. --Macondo (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)