Talk:Armstrong Secret 9

Peer Review 1
Your topic is looking pretty good so far. The only thing I would recommend is checking for grammar errors in a few of your sentences. Also keep searching for more reliable sources. Other than that I think it is a really interesting topic. YoungWizard (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

I appreciate the time you took out on reviewing my topic i've made the few corrections and grammatical errors there was, also i need your help with the dash board on our class.Sir.Leyenda (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Peer review 2
Very interesting topic. Not much history on negro baseball teams before they became famous. Keep up the good work and find more sources and I think this will be a very good article. PINKSUNBURST (talk) 16:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

I'll try my best to do my topic justice any suggestions or places to look at to further my research on my topic? Sir.Leyenda (talk) 00:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Peer Edit
Hello! This is a really interesting article topic since there is not much on African American sports teams decades ago. I won't mention the grammatical and spelling errors since they have been brought up already. I would, however, suggest changing the language in your history subtopic from "amazing talents" to something along the lines of "professional" or "notable" since you don't want it to seem like a POV or biased language. I really like this topic so far and am interested in seeing where it goes. V00d00Child (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Greetings, I've adjusted the article to fit a more professional look, thank you for the tip. Any other suggestions or comments since i've moved the article to main space? Sir.Leyenda (talk) 00:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Peer review
WOW great article!!! I love history and I knew about the negro leagues but I did not know that Armstrong had his own team. Love learning new things!!! If you have not put your article up for the did you know section you really should! I think it would make the cut. :) --Aporter90 (talk) 01:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree that it is a very interesting article. Sadly, according to WP:DYKRULES, the article needs to be very new - created in the last seven days.  The only way to get around that is to expand it massively or get it promoted to good article.  Yaris678 (talk) 16:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)