Talk:Armstrong cases

Tone down
Please tone down the bold face. Cheers. V. Joe 11:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Joe -- most of the current bold face is from the style sheet, and I'm hoping it won't be so glaring once some more text is added. TheronJ 12:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Correct name of case?
I think this article may be ambiguously named. The article refers to the appellate decision, 232 Cal. App. 3d 1060, but this decision actually only used Armstrong's last name. However, I discovered that the lower court decision from August 10, 1984, in the Los Angeles Superior Court include Armstrong's full name in the case name: Church of Scientology of California v. Gerald Armstrong, case number C 420153.  See Ford v. Superior Court, 188 Cal. App. 3d 737, 740 (Cal.App. 1986). Perhaps the ambiguity is too unimportant to justify changing the title of the article. Just wanted to point it out. Taiwan prepares (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Merge
I don't see that Gerry Armstrong has notability outside of this court case. I propose that the material in Gerry Armstrong (activist) be merged here with redirect to follow. Any objections? -Location (talk) 23:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Ongoing opposition up to at least 2015 suggest a notability beyond just those court cases. The 2008 maisonneuve article also supports this claim for ongoing opposition. Klbrain (talk) 21:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)