Talk:Arran whitebeams

Separate articles
These two three species need to be split from each other into their own individual articles. --Rkitko (talk) 17:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't see a pressing need to split the article - it's conventional to treat them together - but the article title would be better as Arran Whitebeams (if it was so it would be possible to redirect species names thereto) Lavateraguy (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It could well be "both/and" rather than "either/or". I certainly think the subject deserves an overall treatment, but there is no need to avoid having a separate article for the individual species with a suitable "See also" if someone is inspired to create them. Definitely agree that first steps are to move the page and create re-directs per Lavateraguy. Ben MacDuiTalk /  Walk  10:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I've been bold and revised this. It turns out that there were already articles for all three species, but one of them had a misspelt title. Took quite a bit of clearing up. Lavateraguy (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Good work and thanks. Ben MacDuiTalk /  Walk  10:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Arran whitebeams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926231618/http://www.ardacad.co.uk/quad/quad7.html to http://www.ardacad.co.uk/quad/quad7.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)