Talk:Arrow (computer science)

Notational incoherence
The syntax used in the definition of this concept is inadequately defined. E.g., the first use of an arrow, in the type specification of the composition, is unreferenced. Thus a reader jumping straight to this article does not have access to the information necessary to parse it. This article would benefit from reference to base documents which introduce the syntax used. -- 205.162.232.254 (talk) 16:27, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Less politely stated: this entire article is a soup of cryptic symbols that are only meaningful to people who probably already understand the material on this page.99.68.168.178 (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Agreed. The notation needs to be explained better, and some concrete examples would help.1Z (talk) 10:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Arrow (computer science). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071014174133/http://haskell.org:80/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/arrow-notation.html to http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/arrow-notation.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)