Talk:ArtRave/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 02:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Grabbing this for a review if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 02:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Great job with the article! I only have relatively minor notes for improvement. Once you address my comments, I will pass this. If possible, could you look at my GAN for Trenyce? Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 03:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Please add an ALT description for the infobox image, as well as the rest of the images in the body of the article.
 * Should you put the number of shows (2 in this case) in the infobox?
 * In this case it was only one show, however it spanned for 2 days since it started on November 10 at night, and continued till November 11 morning. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, that makes more sense; sorry if this was obvious. Aoba47 (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Should location and venue be separate entries as done in Revel Presents: Beyoncé Live?
 * Yup good catch. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I am not sure the “beginning to flourish” quote is entirely necessary as I could see the same idea being told through paraphrasing.
 * You use “reveal” and “revelation” in close proximity in the first paragraph of the “Background and conception” section.
 * You use “announcement” twice in close proximity in the final paragraph of the same section.
 * It seems a little odd that you describe the video showing Gaga’s work with Abramović, but not with Inez or Vinoodh. Do you have information about their videos? If not, then it is fine as it currently stands.
 * They don't actually, I guess Abramovic's videos were more controversial since it showed Gaga naked doing weird shit basically. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * That's what I thought, and that makes sense to me lol Aoba47 (talk) 14:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Would it be worth it to include at the end of the second paragraph of the “Press conference” section that the Gaga’s performance in space never reach fruition?
 * This is more of a personal/style preference, but I am not sure of the value of the image in the “Concert and broadcast” section. It is rather blurry and low quality and I believe it does not add much to the overall article. I would suggest either replacing it with a better quality image or removing it all together, but again this is more up to you.
 * Actually there is no better quality image at all. I haven't been able to procure anything. I suggest we keep it temporarily until a better image is found and then replace it. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me Aoba47 (talk)
 * Are the links in the “External links” section really necessary? They seem more appropriate as sources for the article rather than external links.
 * If you peruse the links, they mainly have photos from the event. Now as I mentioned above, I wasn't able to procure free images I would say these links would help readers to peruse them to see pictures from the event. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, I just want some clarification on the use of the links in this section. Aoba47 (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , all done and let me know if any further clarification is needed. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good to go, I will ✅ this. Aoba47 (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)