Talk:Article 35A of the Constitution of India/Archive 1

Biased?
This article seems to be biased and is more a criticism of Artilce 35A most of the citations are from blogs which are peoples personal opinions which has no place on a encyclopedia.

Only opinion of the expert is quoted while quoting at some point. Every quoted person is a reputed one in the field of the knowledge/research. Quoted are the Professors of Law and representatives of UN. Instead of tendering opinion, editors are requested to add/counter along with the reference. Opinion is making page look bad. Also, please point out any line/text that is wrong and explanation is not provided in the reference. Arvindjksc (talk) 09:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I am not sure who you mean by "editors". All of us are editors, including you. If you would like to make a contribution, I would recommend that you fill in all the citations fully (including author, publisher, date etc.), and tag any sources that you consider questionable with a tag.
 * The subject is controversial and, definitely, its criticism belongs here. On the other hand, you might want to search for sources supporting it and add their views. Nothing will really happen just by complaining! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)