Talk:Artificial Creativity

This is a pretty lame article. Is this indeed a recognised branch of AI? (I.e. is this a real term in regular use?) Ben Finn 12:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Horrible article (I've made some very minor improvements). But artificial creativity has been gaining interest as an independent branch of AI, yes. ---hthth 09:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Rename or Delete later. I think there is a place for an article "Artificial intelligence in art" or "Artificial intelligence and creativity" which could summarize the work listed under "See Also" -- algorithmic composition, poetry and painting. This article, however, has no reason to exist. We should keep it, however, just to preserve the list of links until someone can actually write an article about creativity and AI. ---CharlesGillingham 22:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I think there's definitely cause to keep this article here and try improving it. I recently started a community project of sorts for writing an overview article of artificial creativity. Possible that it'll be viable for donation to Wikipedia, or parts of it, once it gets a bit more meat on it. ---hthth 09:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)