Talk:Artificial being

There seems to be no persuasive reason to retain this page. The term is not notable. RashmiPatel 05:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Reviewed this. I would think this could be a small header under AI (if it even needs that much of a mention), and then turn this page into a redirect. Turlo Lomon 05:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

This page, if it should be retained at all, needs references. My guess is that those references will be found only in science fiction and or maybe speculative futurology. If so, it should be categorized as such. I have taken the liberty of re-categorizing it (perhaps unfairly). Feel free to move it back if you find references that establish this as a concept entertained by serious experts in neurology, emergent behavior or artificial intelligence. -- CharlesGillingham 17:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm planning on making this a redirect in a few days unless someone has an objection. CharlesGillingham 21:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)