Talk:Artificial intelligence for video surveillance

Page name and other issues
or 'Artificial intelligence for security' Ferrara p (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Our Wikipedia page name (title) has been changed to: Artificial intelligence for video surveillance; Although this title may not be literally incorrect or inappropriate, it does not sufficiently cover the scope of the entire process discussed (which occurs subsequent to and as a separate, adjunctive function to surveillance - and in terms of practical security relevance and significance, exceeds by far the limitations of mere surveillance). To wit - we are discussing a software technology and not specifically video surveillance.
 * 2) the rewriting of the article to less-technical more-accessible standards has not yet been acknowledged
 * 3) the links pointing to this article from other related Wikipedia articles has not helped to get our page out of orphan status (and/or are being ignored for some reason?)
 * 4) Please explain #'s 2 and 3 (since the warnings on the page have not been taken down but rather we are now faced with an additional complication of having our page redirected)
 * 5) The article is better titled Video Analytics for Video Surveillance; What is described is older technology. AI for video surveillance requires a different engine where inputs by the user to identify images as to its content or to correct video analytic generated events as true or false can cause the AI engine to learn from its mistakes. RobFire2233 (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 6) How do we appeal to return this article to its original title: Artificial Intelligence for Security
 * 1) (went to the talk page of the editor to post this message - Could not find box to type message in)


 * Please note that "artificial intelligence for security" can in theory deal with a variety of non-video sensors. These sensors include audio (exclusively), radar, laser, network security firewalls and intrusion detection systems, toxic gas sensors, and just about all other sensors with any bearing on security. This should have been obvious. The article, as I see it, however talks merely about processing video feeds. As such, the title of "artificial intelligence for security" would be excessive and therefore inappropriate. Secondly, the prior title "Artificial Intelligence for Security" does not meet the case conventions for page titles on Wikipedia. If you would like to propose a new title, please do so here, but the original title is not specific enough.
 * I have removed the orphan status.
 * --IO Device (talk) 19:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Section headings
Is there anyway to simplify some of the longer section headings? Those headings seem like they might be difficult to link to, and don't quite follow Wikipedia conventions. Me, Myself &#38; I (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

article is not too technical
The article gone-through and re-written from its original in order to make it readable by a non-technical reader. There is no appearance of prolix or jargon or any attempt to make things sound more complicated. In a topic such as this there is a whole universe of possible technical terms, acronyms and technicality. None of that is present. This is a rendering of the subject in the most accessible way, respecting the reader's intelligence, while making no presumptions of any specialized knowledge on their part. There is no requisite of advanced knowledge in order to understand the article.

Although the standards of an encyclopedia allow a somewhat higher level of reading ability than those of daily newspapers, this article could be understood by a typical newspaper readership. When compared to many articles in Wikipedia that are much more technical and yet not marked with a warning of technicality, it is apparent that to maintain a uniform standard throughout as much as possible, this warning should be removed. The purpose of the article is to inform. To make it any less technical would reduce it to jingoism such as "Artificial intelligence for video surveillance (or security) is like computers or robots watching cameras that watch people to see if something bad is happening." That would surely meet the "non technical" warning's goals but at the same time would render the article as not useful. I would consider removing that is light of this clarification. Ken Hantman (talk) 00:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)