Talk:Artificial intuition

Internal links section
Not sure if there is a reason why 'internal links' and 'see also' is separated into 2 sections. I'm going to combine them unless anyone knows why they shouldn't be. Churchgoer251 (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Makes sense to me. Soulparadox 04:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulparadox (talk • contribs)

Discussion section rewrite
I took the liberty of rewriting the 'discussion' part, since it didn't bring any new facts to the table. I modified it to be a list of 'in fiction' references, which it was doing anyway. I am not sure why these fiction references were used, as they have no particular categories, and there are tons of AI references in movies and books. I hope this takes away a bit of the personal reflection or opinion essay problems. Blonkm (talk) 23:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Artificial intuition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331051928/http://sulcus.berkeley.edu/FLM/SH/MDL/GAL/GalDisChapts/galdis.chapter1.html to http://sulcus.berkeley.edu/FLM/SH/MDL/GAL/GalDisChapts/galdis.chapter1.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111025135704/http://www.itp.edu:80/about/carl_jung.php to http://www.itp.edu/about/carl_jung.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101209061928/http://metamaps.cc:80/2010/07/topos-blueprint-gen002/ to http://metamaps.cc/2010/07/topos-blueprint-gen002/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Source for the term
Is there a source that uses and defines the term "artificial intuition" (that isn't just a sales pitch)? How is this different than "sub-symbolic AI"? Do the people who define the term actually use all this stuff about Jung, etc.? CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Tried to poke the original author, and, surprise surprise he is blocked. I will cut out links to this article from the central AI page. Please discuss if you are interested. CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

This article was ALREADY DELETED. Would someone mind nominating it again? Thanks. CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2017 (UTC)d