Talk:Artist's Studio—Look Mickey/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Lead is a bit short.
 * Expanded.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Details --> Description
 * O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * "For someone familiar with the artist's oeuvre, the Studios could become mental playgrounds." --> Who said that?
 * Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Critical commentary --> This really isn't enough for its own section.
 * I have added some more. I know the section is still small, but I think it is proper to format a work with this type of section if we can source a few comments, like we have.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is fine now. Statυs  (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Everything else looks good. Well referenced and written.


 * All issues have been addressed. Passing the article! Great work! Statυs  (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * drive by comment
 * I think given the excessive quotes in the footnotes copyvio should be addressed. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)