Talk:Artistry (cosmetics)/Archives/2015

Absoltely no independent evidence
Clearly, this is a blatant attempt by Quixtar to exploit Wikipedia to market it's own brand names. There is absoltely no independent evidence or references, and terms like "breakthroughs" "unique claims" and "NAO's imagery is younger, daring, and more fantasious than Artistry" has absolutely no substantiation in fact, and does not follow Wikipedia's NPOV standards.
 * Yes, Requires rewriting, I will do so. --Insider201283 23:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)