Talk:Artistry of Michael Jackson

Discussion of Neutrality, uncited sources and other lacking aspects or, alleged lacking aspects of this page
Let's talk about the "disputed" nuetrality of this article. What's disputed and what isn't NPOV? Let's discuss what can be changed/improved about this article. It frustrates me when people put templates like this at the top of article but don't discuss why. Street walker 07:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * If people make a claim, but are not willing to support it, ignoring is normally the best policy. Any one who makes any NPOV claim such as the tag placed, and does not support it should be removed. The most likely cause is vandalism. --161.74.11.24 12:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Um, the article is covered in POV and rubbish. Every uncited part of the article is now pointed out, and any attempt to source it with stupid articles or links to members of that MJJforum will be reverted ad nauseum.--Manboobies 23:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)