Talk:Artwork (album)

Tracklist?
1. Blood On My Hands 2. Empty With You 3. Born To Quit 4. Cut Yourself 5. Sold My Soul 6. Watered Down 7. On The Cross 8. Come Undone 9. Meant To Die 10. The Best Of Me 11. Men Are All The Same —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.63.230 (talk) 02:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not inclined to do much about the ping pong of edits adding/subtracting songs. Sooner or later, we'll get an authoritative tracklist, and this will end.  No point in protecting that I can see.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Well what about the songs that were just added? where are the sources for those? 24.45.63.230 (talk) 22:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh Joy, Now They're Posted 24.45.63.230 (talk) 03:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Bonus tracks/B-sides
This section currently consists of a b-side from the "Blood on My Hands" single, and an unsourced/untitled bonus track. I don't think either of these are really worth mentioning here. Maybe the bonus track once a title is known, but just "TBA" seems really pointless. A lot of information about a future class album article could be summed up as TBA, but it should probably just be left blank until further notice. Fezmar9 (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Singles contain b-sides from the album in most cases and since this song was recorded during the artwork sessions, it classifies as a b-side, the single release is a way to get it out there. So it stays... just like on the LFTL page, dark days and devil besides you are listed (they are b-sides from the bird and worm single) -Jakers 78 (talk) 00:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I am well aware of what a b-side is, I just don't understand why it should be listed in the track listing. Or why it should be mentioned anywhere on this page since the song in question is a b-side of the "Blood on My Hands" single. Especially in the case of an instrumental version of a song, rather than a song written and recorded for Artwork but was not added for various reasons. An argument of, "but this other page has it..." does not hold much weight, so by stating that "Lies for the Liars has b-sides therefore this one should" is a rather weak argument. Especially when you take into consideration that Lies for the Liars is a very poorly written article. Why should any album article list b-sides in the track listing section? Fezmar9 (talk) 01:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I admittedly just removed the unsourced sentence about the b-sides, not knowing there was a discussion here. Anyway, I know on 21st Century Breakdown, which recently passed GA, it was decided to list the B-sides, as they were recorded in the same sessions - I guess in some way they are notable. As for here though, there's absolutely nothing verifying them, nothing concrete enough to make them a part of the track listing anyway. Perhaps that Kyte line could be integrated into the, umm, otherwise brief article. k.i.a.c  ( talktome  -  contribs ) 06:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I was monitoring the new Green Day album for a while up until it was up for GA review. I noticed the addition of b-sides on that article, however I now notice they have since been removed. Fezmar9 (talk) 15:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Everyone on green days is there but they are hidden, all bonus tracks nad bsides are very important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Little BIG mike 25 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Complaint by IP
0 I'm fucking up this article so someone who knows what the hell their doing will fix it. I hope the capital WAS pointed it out, but if not, I'll clarify. Its fucking goddamn wrote as if the fucking album is yet to be released here in this paragraph. Two paragraphs down its wrote as if it has already came out. Which is it? I know it's out cause I have it, but to anyone unfamiliar, they'd have no clue. and thats not even a mention of their video "blood on my hands"The limited so edition fucking pre-order fix of it. this version, in addition to some band merchandise, will come with two unreleased b-sides, "In a Needle" and "On the Cross (Save Yourself Mix)," which wi'll be checking back in a day or so, if its fixed, then thanks, if not, and ip change and i'll fuck it up, but a bit less obviously.ll be sent digitally before the release of Geeze thanks. I would have but I'm an awful editor. I don't know any of the codes and what not that you have to put after whatever you write. But really thanks though, and wrong way or not, I did suceed in getting the article change, did I not? Thanks, and apologies for messing with the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.23.0.32 (talk) 04:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I've started work. I'll do more later today.  Thank you for letting me know.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * How about you do it yourself, sweetheart? Editors here are volunteers... why the fuck should we be doing what your whining demands we do? The "Blood on My Hands" music video has a section on the "Blood on My Hands" page, duh. kiac.  ( talk - contrib ) 01:29, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If you promise you will vandalize this article, I can ask for your block. Would you like to be blocked?  Vandalism doesn't fix anything.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs  04:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Come on guys, remember WP:BITE. This guy obviously doesn't know how to.  And I'm an admin, let me worry about the block policy, OK?  He made a good point.--Wehwalt (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Can we make a page along the lines of "Don't hate on the regulars", will that affect these pointless discussions too? The smartass even thinks he's done good by abusing people, just because he got his way. What a joke. kiac.  ( talk - contrib ) 07:09, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Dude, this is about building an encyclopedia. Not about personalities.  When I get a chance, I'll do some more on the article.  OK?  In addition to the project, The Used deserve better pages than they got.  Let's just swallow and work on it.--Wehwalt (talk) 07:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)--Wehwalt (talk) 07:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Artwork (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081009233811/http://www.bostonmusicspotlight.com:80/article.php?id=979 to http://www.bostonmusicspotlight.com/article.php?id=979

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Artwork (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019040109/http://australian-charts.com/search.asp?search=the+used&cat=a to http://australian-charts.com/search.asp?search=the+used&cat=a

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:36, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Artwork (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130322142732/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16771 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16771
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111210174500/http://www.theused.net/news/2009/08/05/artwork-release-date-831 to http://www.theused.net/news/2009/08/05/artwork-release-date-831
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120620161540/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16770 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16770
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130322142732/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16771 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16771
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/29607523/review/29716121/artwork
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229214829/http://www.theused.net/news/2009/08/17/different-configurations-artwork to http://www.theused.net/news/2009/08/17/different-configurations-artwork

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring
Can you please contact Oshwah or another administrator to protect this page if I ever keep reverting edits, Binksternet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Better Than My Life (talk • contribs)


 * Like I wrote on your user talk page, "You have been adding unsuitable, inaccurate, incomprehensible or plain wrong alt text to music articles" using IP addresses and this username. Your alt text work provides very poor descriptions. using a clumsy grasp of English. I don't see how this stuff is helping the reader. Binksternet (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)