Talk:Aruba at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hello! ✅ Begin as of now and will end in a few minutes! ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Great article; I disagree with the ip-address above; size is quite immaterial. I will pass it to GA. Regards!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 10:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Great article; I disagree with the ip-address above; size is quite immaterial. I will pass it to GA. Regards!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 10:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall: Great article; I disagree with the ip-address above; size is quite immaterial. I will pass it to GA. Regards!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 10:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:

A great lead, which summarize the content below.
 * Lead
 * Opening and closing ceremonies
 * "Opening Ceremony" should not be capitalized
 * Done. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Judo
 * "Judoka" should be linked
 * Done. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Everything correct
 * Swimming
 * References
 * Ref 1: What does [sic] means in the title parameter? The work is "multimedia.olympic.org" and the publisher the IOC.
 * Explanation "sic" is used because in the work, the people misspelled Beijing as "Bejing." Sic means "as is." --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Done Work and publisher issue addressed. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Ref 2: Why is the language "French and English"? I only see English. The work is "multimedia.olympic.org" and the publisher the IOC.
 * Explanation It actually is in English and French. There are rows in both languages. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Done Work and publisher issue addressed. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Ref 3 seems to be fine
 * Ref 4 also
 * The last ref is very strange and don't think it belongs there. I would create a section called "External links" and put it there.
 * Done + Comment I think that it was used to source the article previously, when it was just a stub. I've removed it because it now seems pretty extraneous. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

If these things are done, I will change to GA-status. Congratulation and Regards!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Too many short paragraphs imo to be a GA. Needs to be brilliant. this is not
 * Wow, a very great review. You know, that size is not the most relevant thing for articles; quality ahead quantity. There is really nothing to add in the paragraphs, or have you a suggestion? "Needs to be brilliant"; no it should be good not "brilliant". And don't forget the four tildes after your comment.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 21:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

For short articles it needs to be brilliant. For longer articles good. Read GA instead of embarrasing your self —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.254.209 (talk) 21:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)