Talk:Ary Scheffer

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

recovery of Christus Consolator
the AP reported on the recovery and display of the original, source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PAINTING_REDISCOVERED (it shows the photo of the painting). Samuelsenwd (talk) 19:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Ary Scheffer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030622012053/http://www.artrenewal.org:80/asp/database/art.asp?aid=482 to http://www.artrenewal.org/asp/database/art.asp?aid=482

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Gallery
Six images is not a surfeit and a small gallery is appropriate in an artist bio. Ewulp (talk) 06:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It's seven images and there are already a plethora of images in this article. A gallery should not be a place in an article for an indiscriminate collection of an artist's work. Do these additional images add needed content to the article? There were already nine rather large images in an article that is only 1425 words long. Does the Gallery fulfill the parameters of WP:GALLERY? In my opinion no. Shearonink (talk) 13:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, yes! Johnbod (talk) 15:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, there should be a gallery or yes, the gallery was too much?... I'm not sure what question/concern you're answering "Yes" to. Shearonink (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * !! Obviously, yes there should be a gallery (in my opinion). Johnbod (talk) 16:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * So you are fine with the size of the present gallery and with the number of images in the article. Shearonink (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * They may not be be the best selection & more explanatory captions would be good, but otherwise yes. Lots of illustrations are to be expected in visual arts articles; for some reason some editors find them annoying. Personally I think the incidental images of house, statue, tomb etc could be corralled into another gallery. Johnbod (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok then, enjoy and have at it. Shearonink (talk) 17:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)