Talk:As I was going by Charing Cross/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 19:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

: After some minor gramamtical corrections and wikification, I believe this article follows MOS guidelines for prose at a respectable quality. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article makes good use of several reliable sources, with frequent citations and nothing left to OR chance. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: Bearing in mind that the article is very small, it does appear to cover all relevant aspects of the topic for which reputable information from third-party material could be acquired, and does not contain any trivial details. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article bears no bias towards or against its topic. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC) . The article's history goes back to its creation in 2005, and shows no indication of any edit warring. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC) : The two images used in the article are public domain, and serve a relevant purpose in the article. Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

I remember having read a comment by another user, with an example provided, that size in itself does not make much difference in whether an article can qualify for GA status. I must admit, I had some doubts that in my experience as a GA reviewer I would ever come across an article fitting this bill, but I believe that I have, as of this one. Congratulations! Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for the rapid review and for dealing with the size issue. There is probably not much else that can be said about this topic based on reliable sources. Much appreciated.--  SabreBD  (talk) 20:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)