Talk:Aseptic processing

Untitled
"Pharmaceuticals being life saving, their packages are never recycled."

Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.188.220.208 (talk) 14:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Briannyakundi335.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Aseptic processing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110107085551/http://www.aseptic.org:80/faq.html to http://www.aseptic.org/faq.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Aseptic processing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120722200658/http://www.flowcontrolnetwork.com/applications/food-and-beverage/article/aseptics-ship-sets-sail to http://www.flowcontrolnetwork.com/applications/food-and-beverage/article/aseptics-ship-sets-sail
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008134221/http://www.aseptic.org/Award%20Main.shtml to http://www.aseptic.org/Award%20Main.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706142506/http://www.aseptic.org/Recycling%20&%20Aseptic%20Packaging.shtml to http://www.aseptic.org/Recycling%20&%20Aseptic%20Packaging.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Too US-centric
The article has an excessively US-based bias. For example, Tetra Pak is mentioned as an introduction to the US market. It originated in Sweden and was exported around Europe before it arrived in the USA, I believe.

Marchino61 (talk) 10:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Some confusion in this article - too food centric!
The opening of this article is very misleading - it has been edited. The term more usually is cold filter sterilization - not maintenance of the sterility of a heat sterilized product using aseptic techniques during transfer to a final packaged format. Though clearly you do want this and thus the confusion.

The sections on document and record keeping are distractions and likely belong in an article relating to 'Regulated Industry'.

There is a big red flag here - reprocessing - FDA issues!!!

The original article is food centric - but this process and expression are very common in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products - largely injectable products.

Needs more work. BeingObjective (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Food and Pharma - the original version is incorrect.
The term is used BOTH in Pharma and Food - I made it reflect this - I do not see a need for two separate articles - and the intro - is accurate and has solid ref. This is not a subtle matter and the prior/reverted version are simply incorrect - PLEASE discuss here an do not enter into a edit war - especially if you are not a PHARMA or FOOD industry pro. BeingObjective (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Your revision was neither constructive nor aids the reader's understanding of the topic. And no, you don't have to be a pro to edit an article. -- Wiki Linuz  ( talk ) 02:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * BO's edits (plural: it is not ONE single revision) are less wrong compared to what we have here.
 * The lede is a little too scattered, but that is fixable.
 * Pharma sites are not RS, true, but it's enough to show that such term does have such a meaning. A little digging down that line (web search "aseptic processing pharmaceutical") reveals . A focus on compounding pharmacies compared to production line machines in journal-literature is expected here, because machines are more likely found in patents.
 * The FDA stuff should be restored, but it does need VERY HEAVY trimming. Like why are we talking about forms and filing systems? To know that low-acid needs attention for endospores, and that there's inspection and incubation tests for food, is enough.
 * Artoria2e5 🌉 05:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/aseptic-processing-primer
 * https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-guides/aseptic-processing-and-packaging-food-industry
 * Likely two articles - though I am not getting embroiled. BeingObjective (talk) 13:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, pharma websites are not reliable. -- Wiki Linuz  ( talk ) 02:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

I will just park these two authoratative links here and slink away.
https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/aseptic-processing-primer

https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-guides/aseptic-processing-and-packaging-food-industry BeingObjective (talk) 13:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)