Talk:Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.

Please don't tag as "copy paste"
I have been creating articles using my class notes. I break these cases up into "facts," "issue," "holding" etc, because that's the conventional way that law students are taught to organize cases ... you can see it for example at Eisner v. Macomber (facts, issue, decision).Agradman (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

i promise it is notable!
Hi, I get this a lot with cases I put up, the suggestion that they're not notable. Usually it's because the subject matter seems silly (like here, someone finding a tack in her pie ... or Haverly_v._United_States). But as ironic as it sounds, these cases are brought up in our law school curriculum to illustrate very large points of law. For example, in the Haverly case, you can see from the notes at the bottom that the case is important because it illustrates something about how the Tax Commissioner solved a difficult dilemma. This case (ash v. childs) was very important about determining whether injuries like this needed to be resolved in tort versus contract. Agradman (talk) 20:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)