Talk:Ashley Feinberg

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... the attempt to delete it is probably an act of hate against Feinberg for her views and opinion. --203.217.91.182 (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * This accusation doesn't warrant much of a response, but sure, I'll bite. I do not hate Feinberg for any reason, and I am not familiar with her work. Feinberg does seem to have a sizable Twitter following (164,000 followers as of now) and is a prolific writer for Huffpost. These two things about her do not earn her a Wikipedia page. In fact, the page is so anemic that I see little reason for its existence. Feinberg doesn't seem notable in any way. She may be a well-liked journalist or modestly Twitter famous, but if everyone with those qualifications got their own Wikipedia page, we would all have a lot of work to do. KidAd (talk) 23:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because she has been written about in multiple notable publications. The lorax (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Employer
The infobox and the lede offer Slate (magazine) matched by at least one reference in the body, but the body actually says Huffpost, is that as it should be? I also don't quite get if Slate (magazine) is independent of The Washington Post, the Slate article mumbles something about a WaPo "publisher". –84.46.53.107 (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Updated the body of the article to include she joined Slate in May 2019.The lorax (talk) 04:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. –84.46.53.99 (talk) 04:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)