Talk:Ashley Mote

Untitled
Not sure if these belong in the article or not:


 * OverCrowded Britain: Our Immigration Crisis Exposed, April 2003, Tanner Publishing. ISBN 0954012410


 * Vigilance: A Defence of British Liberty, April 2001, Tanner Publishing. ISBN 0954012402


 * The Winning Edge: The Secrets and Techniques of the World's Best Cricketers, June 2001, The Parrs Wood Press. ISBN 1903158184


 * John Nyren's Cricketers of My Time, May 1998, Robson Books Ltd. ISBN 1861051689


 * The Glory Days of Cricket: Biography of Broadhalfpenny Down, September 1997, Robson Books Ltd, ISBN 1861051115

http://www.author.co.uk/tanner/index.htm - Tanner publishing web site - the useful links section includes the BNP but not the UKIP. Tanner publishing only seems to have published two books and was done by Amolibros which looks like vanity publishing. Secretlondon 15:38, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Sure they belong in the article, he wrote them. The site says "Amolibros is not a vanity publisher - it is a consultancy designed to help you publish your own book", whether that's worth anything. Such operations are different from 'vanity presses' per se ... sometimes. Amolibrios promo sheet. There is an unrelated Tanner Publishing in Canada. You can buy the book through the Conservative Party shop.


 * I can't quickly find any other evidence Mote was ever BNP.


 * Off-topic: look what Vigilance gets placed with here - David Gerard 16:24, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

+before
The European Elections on 13 June 2004 confirmed th e dominant place of the ...

Question
May I ask what "had the party whip removed" means in the UK? --Deville 02:30, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

they removed his party membership by not following the lines. See the new link in the article. Mion 03:02, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I guessed it meant something like that, but I wasn't sure, and my feeling is that a lot of readers won't.  Much better now!  --Deville 03:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

"nine charges of false accounting and one of making a false representation."
Was he charged or let off as innocent in the end? Would be interesting to know.

On 4 September 2007, he was found guilty on charges of falsely claiming benefit of £65,000 ($130,000). The court found him guilty of eight charges of false accounting, eight of obtaining a money transfer by deception, four of evading liability and one of failing to notify a change of circumstances.

He was sentenced to 9 months in jail. As the sentence is less than 12 months, he does not have to relinquish his seat in the European Parliament. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.74.168.195 (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Ashley Mote. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110612053351/http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article3101332.ece to http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article3101332.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Ashley Mote. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110612055906/http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/markets/europe/article1293257.ece to http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/markets/europe/article1293257.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Ashley Mote. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/5gsWfOmKo?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.portsmouth.co.uk%2Fnewshome%2FEuro-MP-to-stand-down.5250407.jp with https://web.archive.org/web/20090514014121/http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Euro-MP-to-stand-down.5250407.jp on http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Euro-MP-to-stand-down.5250407.jp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ashley Mote. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520125922/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5486642 to http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5486642

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Two Important Errors on this Website
This website is wrong and two crucial issues:

1.	 At no time did I ever ask the EU for immunity from prosecution. There is not a shred of evidence to support the allegation. The EU DEMANDED that the notion of a British MEP being immune be tested in EU law – and I was the candidate, precisely because they wanted to have me prosecuted. As a matter of principle I agreed – and told them so. But they wanted a test case to establish the law.

2.	 An analysis of the events before, during and after my trial demonstrate that English law was not properly applied. In particular: - English law was used to decide EU law; - the judge was hand-picked; - the charges I faced were changed several times, including at the end of the trial; - the final version of the charges were never put to me; - my defence was wilfully obstructed; - the timing of the trial was orchestrated for blatant political purposes; - and afterwards the EU demanded compensation!

The facts should be known, especially given the connivance of the two governments. The full story is now on my website: http://amoteinbrusselseye.blogspot.com/

Ashley Mote